Friday, March 24, 2006
Heh! ... Ha! ... Take that!: They're ... still ... harping ... on ... the pre-war arguments for going to war. ... I like Vanya's comments in the first link. ... Question: Do you think the debate over the pre-war debate would be occurring now if things were going better in Iraq? Just asking. ... A lot of ass covering is going on. ...
Update -- It's official: Charles Krauthammer has given permission to use the words 'civil war' when describing Iraq. ... I assume this means we can also still use the word 'insurgency,' last year's forbidden description before reality took hold. ... Actually, Charles' column is quite good and the best argument I've read yet for sticking it out. What's annoying are those still arguing over pre-war arguments while not looking at the realities on the ground today. Oh, I forgot. The media is distorting events. Things are going just swell in Iraq. ... Riiiight.
Update -- It's official: Charles Krauthammer has given permission to use the words 'civil war' when describing Iraq. ... I assume this means we can also still use the word 'insurgency,' last year's forbidden description before reality took hold. ... Actually, Charles' column is quite good and the best argument I've read yet for sticking it out. What's annoying are those still arguing over pre-war arguments while not looking at the realities on the ground today. Oh, I forgot. The media is distorting events. Things are going just swell in Iraq. ... Riiiight.
