Wednesday, August 09, 2006
How to redefine victory, Part II
A devastating critique of the National Review. ... I find it curious the article appears in the American Spectator, which had its own crack-up last decade due to its Clinton obsession. ... The problem with both magazines, in my humble opinion, is that they became too partisan and less philosophical. They became more intent on winning arguments, not exploring arguments. They became, as I've said before, mirror images of the left in their fanatical argumentative tactics. I stopped reading them after I realized I already knew what they'd say on issues. ... Neal Freeman piece via AS.
A devastating critique of the National Review. ... I find it curious the article appears in the American Spectator, which had its own crack-up last decade due to its Clinton obsession. ... The problem with both magazines, in my humble opinion, is that they became too partisan and less philosophical. They became more intent on winning arguments, not exploring arguments. They became, as I've said before, mirror images of the left in their fanatical argumentative tactics. I stopped reading them after I realized I already knew what they'd say on issues. ... Neal Freeman piece via AS.
