Saturday, October 09, 2010
A conspiracy theory about conspiracy theories, Part II
Now we’re getting closer to a more plausible conspiracy-theory truth: Cahill and Patrick’s people were playing footsie. The two camps deny it. But it’s more believable than the idea that Paul Loscocco was a “tool of Charlie Baker’s sleazy hit team,’’ a traitorous mole inserted into Cahill’s campaign and then extracted to inflict maximum damage – as if Baker wanted to strengthen Cahill’s campaign so he could later destroy it. Make sense? Nope. … What does make sense? Put your conspiracy hat on and ask: Who’s benefited all along from the Cahill candidacy? Just pointing out the logical dots. … It’s indeed been a wacky week. I’m loving every minute of it. Good timing, too. The Pats have a bye-week this weekend.
Update -- Baker beats back Cahill attacks.
Now we’re getting closer to a more plausible conspiracy-theory truth: Cahill and Patrick’s people were playing footsie. The two camps deny it. But it’s more believable than the idea that Paul Loscocco was a “tool of Charlie Baker’s sleazy hit team,’’ a traitorous mole inserted into Cahill’s campaign and then extracted to inflict maximum damage – as if Baker wanted to strengthen Cahill’s campaign so he could later destroy it. Make sense? Nope. … What does make sense? Put your conspiracy hat on and ask: Who’s benefited all along from the Cahill candidacy? Just pointing out the logical dots. … It’s indeed been a wacky week. I’m loving every minute of it. Good timing, too. The Pats have a bye-week this weekend.
Update -- Baker beats back Cahill attacks.
