‘The Battle Between Ayn Rand And Collectivism Reaches A Climax’
They really think like this. … It’s
almost as if the writer, unconsciously, internalized and emulated Whittaker
Chambers’ famous description of how Ayn Rand groupies see the world as a stark battleground
between the forces of good and evil, without realizing Chambers was mocking
them. From Chambers, in his famous take down of Atlas Shrugged in the National
Review, when William F. Buckley Jr. was still alive and keeping the wingnuts at bay:
One Big Brother
is, of course, a socializing elite (as we know, several cut-rate brands are on
the shelves). Miss Rand, as the enemy of any socializing force, calls in a Big
Brother of her own contriving to do battle with the other. … The author hasn’t,
apparently, brooded on the degree to which, in a wicked world, a materialism of
the Right and a materialism of the Left first surprisingly resemble, then, in
action, tend to blend each with each, because, while differing at the top in
avowed purpose, and possibly in conflict there, at bottom they are much the
same thing.
I also loved
these grafs from Chambers:
The Children of
Darkness are caricatures, too; and they are really oozy. But at least they are
caricatures of something identifiable. Their archetypes are Left-Liberals, New
Dealers, Welfare Statists, One Worlders, or, at any rate, such ogreish
semblances of these as may stalk the nightmares of those who think little about
people as people, but tend to think a great deal in labels and effigies. (And
neither Right nor Left, be it noted in passing, has a monopoly of such
dreamers, though the horrors in their nightmares wear radically different masks
and labels.)
In Atlas
Shrugged, all this debased inhuman riffraff is lumped as "looters."
... "Looters" loot because they believe in Robin Hood, and have got a
lot of other people believing in him, too. Robin Hood is the author's image of
absolute evil — robbing the strong (and hence good) to give to the weak (and
hence no good). All "looters" are base, envious, twisted, malignant
minds, motivated wholly by greed for power, combined with the lust of the weak
to tear down the strong, out of a deepseated hatred of life and secret longing
for destruction and death.
By the way, the author in the first Forbes link (yes, Forbes) refers to the Children of Darkness as "parasites."
Parasites. Nice language, huh?